An open invitation to Smash EDO's public debate: Is breaking the law to resist war crimes ever justified?
from smashedo, 29 July 2009:
On Monday (27 July 2009) The Argus reported that the police spent £310,000 on the policing of Smash EDO's Mayday! Mayday! protest.
On Tuesday August 11th 2009 Smash EDO will be holding a public debate around the subject of direct action under the heading "Is breaking the Law to Resist War Crimes Ever Justified?".
As you are aware people in Brighton have, for the last five years, used all kinds of direct action to highlight EDO's involvement in world wide conflicts.
This has included blockades, rooftop occupations and mass street protests. In January six people broke into EDO MBM/ITT and damaged machinery to stop it being used against the people of Gaza.
The meeting will debate mass street actions, and Mayday in particular, as a tactic in campaigning against EDO MBM/ITT.
On Mayday thousands of people from Brighton and around the UK joined together to show resistance against EDO and the companies, like Barclays Bank and Mcdonalds, who invest in it.
One of the reasons that campaigners chose to take their protest to the centre of Brighton was that Sussex Police have done everything they can to prevent protest at the factory.
At Brighton Magistrates Court, on Monday 27th July, Sussex Police admitted that they had intended to prevent October's Shut ITT demonstration from reaching the factory at all. In doing so, they attacked demonstrators with batons, pepper spray and dogs.
The cost of policing the protest only reflects the lengths Sussex Police are prepared to go to to repress dissent in Brighton.
The debate on the 11th will be a chance to debate the tactic of mass street protests like Mayday.
The debate will also discuss the legitimacy of January's decommissioning of EDO. On January 17th, as the bombs rained on Gaza, six people broke into the factory and caused 300 000 pounds worth of damage.
They say they were acting to prevent war crimes being committed by Israeli forces using weaponry including EDO components. We say that their action was legitimate and necessary.
We invite the people of Brighton to come and discuss the decommissioning. Ewa Jasiewicz, who was in Gaza as a human rights worker during the bombing, will join the debate.
The debate will take place on TUESDAY AUGUST 11TH at 7.30pm at the Friends Meeting House, Ship Street, Brighton. Everyone welcome.
Email: smashedopress@riseup.net
Most recent articles
- Inmate-frying microwave pain blaster turret installed in US jail
- Urgent Action Appeal: Imminent forced eviction of Gypsies and Travellers of Hovefields and Dale Farm, UK
- Further anti-capitalist actions called in Bruxelles during No Borders Camp 25 September – 3 October 2010
- No Border Camp in Brussels from 27 September - 3 October 2010
Most popular images today
Reclaim the Future 5: A vast day/night party event in a liberated, occupied space in London, 5 September 2009
from email, updated 6 September 2009: "Reclaim the Future 5 is a vast all-day all-night information and party event in a liberated, self-managed occupied venue somewhere in London on Saturday 5 September 2009.
* At least two rooms of live bands 9pm-4am
* DJs 4am-7am
* Cabaret * Workshops and stalls all afternoon - info on the arms trade, the G20, prisoner & detainee support, squatting, samba, permaculture, climate change, bike repair, and more... more
Police Review: magazine cartoon - "In staggeringly poor taste"
from J4J campaign, 18 November 2008: We would imagine that, in the midst of the inquest into the death of Jean Charles de Menezes, publications aimed at and widely read by serving police officers would show greater sensitivity in the way they talk about fatal shootings by the police. But evidently not. The magazine "Police Review", in its 14 November edition, decided that the introduction of new rules preventing firearms officers from conferring after a shooting was best illustrated by this appalling cartoon. more
delicious
digg
reddit
newsvine
furl
google
yahoo
technorati
